北京赛车PK10冠军大小计划当天计划表歡迎您的到來!

您所在的位置: 首頁 > 雅思 > 雅思閱讀

雅思閱讀——摘要題

作者:

2015-07-31 新通教育

新通雅思高分素材庫出爐啦!眾所周知,雅思閱讀一直是中國考生的薄弱項,新通教育為幫助廣大雅思考生突破閱讀瓶頸,提高閱讀成績,特地精心整理了雅思閱讀高分分類素材庫。那快來雅思閱讀高分素材庫汲取營養吧!

 Attitudes to language

    It is not easy to be systematic and objective about language study. Popular linguistic debate regularly deteriorates into invective and polemic. Language belongs to everyone, so most people feel they have a right to hold an opinion about it. And when opinions differ, emotions can run high. Arguments can start as easily over minor points of usage as over major policies of linguistic education.
 
    Language, moreover, is a very public behaviour, so it is easy for different usages to be noted and criticised. No part of society or social behaviour is exempt: linguistic factors influence how we judge personality, intelligence, social status, educational standards, job aptitude, and many other areas of identity and social survival. As a result, it is easy to hurt, and to be hurt, when language use is unfeelingly attacked.
 
    In its most general sense, prescriptivism is the view that one variety of language has an inherently higher value than others, and that this ought to be imposed on the whole of the speech community. The view is propounded especially in relation to grammar and vocabulary, and frequently with reference to pronunciation. The variety which is favoured, in this account, is usually a version of the ‘standard’ written language, especially as encountered in literature, or in the formal spoken language which most closely reflects this style. Adherents to this variety are said to speak or write ‘correctly’; deviations from it are said to be ‘incorrect’.
 
    All the main languages have been studied prescriptively, especially in the 18th century approach to the writing of grammars and dictionaries. The aims of these early grammarians were threefold: (a) they wanted to codify the principles of their languages, to show that there was a system beneath the apparent chaos of usage, (b) they wanted a means of settling disputes over usage, and (c) they wanted to point out what they felt to be common errors, in order to ‘improve’ the language. The authoritarian nature of the approach is best characterised by its reliance on ‘rules’ of grammar. Some usages are ‘prescribed’, to be learnt and followed accurately; others are ‘proscribed’, to be avoided. In this early period, there were no half-measures: usage was either right or wrong, and it was the task of the grammarian not simply to record alternatives, but to pronounce judgement upon them.
 
    These attitudes are still with us, and they motivate a widespread concern that linguistic standards should be maintained. Nevertheless, there is an alternative point of view that is concerned less with standards than with the facts of linguistic usage. This approach is summarised in the statement that it is the task of the grammarian to describe, not prescribe to record the facts of linguistic diversity, and not to attempt the impossible tasks of evaluating language variation or halting language change. In the second half of the 18th century, we already find advocates of this view, such as Joseph Priestley, whose Rudiments of English Grammar (1761) insists that ‘the custom of speaking is the original and only just standard of any language.’ Linguistic issues, it is argued, cannot be solved by logic and legislation. And this view has become the tenet of the modern linguistic approach to grammatical analysis.
 
     In our own time, the opposition between ‘descriptivists’ and ‘prescriptivists’ has often become extreme, with both sides painting unreal pictures of the other. Descriptive grammarians have been presented as people who do not care about standards, because of the way they see all forms of usage as equally valid. Prescriptive grammarians have been presented as blind adherents to a historical tradition. The opposition has even been presented in quasi-political terms - of radical liberalism vs elitist conservatism.
 
Question 9-12
Complete the summary using the list of words, A-l, below.
Write the correct letter, A-1, in boxes 9-12 on your answer sheet.
The language debate
According to 9            , there is only one correct form of language. Linguists who take this approach to language place great importance on grammatical 10            .
Conversely, the view of 11           , such as Joseph Priestley, is that grammar should be based on 12                .

A   descriptivists         B language experts C popular speech
D   formal language        E evaluation         F rules
G   modern linguists        H prescriptivists          I change

 

查看正確答案和解析

雅思 保分課程

課程名稱 學習目標 班級特色
雅思5.5分鉆石小班 雅思5.5分 夯實基礎綜合提高 報名
雅思6.5分沖刺9人班 保6沖6.5分 名師課程超低價格 報名
雅思考前沖刺班 沖刺7分 短期集訓沖刺高分 報名
雅思基礎VIP1V1課程 個人定制 針對個人量身定制課程 報名
雅思VIP高端定制7分班 保6.5爭7分 小班保分通過 報名
雅思考前點題班(周末) 雅思6.5分 助教全程跟進服務升級 報名

更多分享

劍橋雅思真題系列免費打包下載
  • 劍橋雅思官方真題4-11合集

    免費下載

    格式: doc 大。20.0MB

    免費下載
  • 劍橋雅思聽力考試真題合集

    免費下載

    格式: doc 大。26.5MB

    免費下載
  • 劍橋雅思寫作高分范文合集

    免費下載

    格式: doc 大。612KB

    免費下載
語培留學服務
  • 考試提醒
  • 報名
  • 考試
  • 查分
2019年雅思考試報名時間

近期考試:1月5日 1月12日 1月17日 1月19日 1月26日

近期考試:1月5日 1月12日 1月17日 1月19日 1月26日

2019年雅思成績查詢入口

近期考試:1月5日 1月12日 1月17日 1月19日 1月26日

  • 考前預測
  • 名師押題 縮小范圍100%命中
北京赛车PK10冠军大小计划当天计划表 北京PK10全天两期计划 北京赛车PK10计划开奖号